问题

You are supposed to provide a solution to a given problem.

Problem:
Is W = {[x, y] in R^2: x >= 0 and y >= 0} a subspace of R^2?
Solution:

答案

模型 模型答案 正确答案
金声玉亮2.0 To determine if W = {[x, y] in R^2: x >= 0 and y >= 0} is a subspace of R^2, we need to check if W satisfies the three subspace properties:

1. The zero vector is in W.
2. W is closed under vector addition.
3. W is closed under scalar multiplication.

Let's check these properties one by one:

1. The zero vector is in W.
The zero vector in R^2 is [0, 0]. Since 0 >= 0 and 0 >= 0, the zero vector is indeed in W.

2. W is closed under vector addition.
Let [x1, y1] and [x2, y2] be two vectors in W. Then x1 >= 0, y1 >= 0, x2 >= 0, and y2 >= 0.
The sum of these two vectors is [x1 + x2, y1 + y2].
Since x1 >= 0, x2 >= 0, then x1 + x2 >= 0.
Similarly, since y1 >= 0, y2 >= 0, then y1 + y2 >= 0.
Therefore, [x1 + x2, y1 + y2] is also in W, and W is closed under vector addition.

3. W is closed under scalar multiplication.
Let [x, y] be a vector in W and c be a scalar.
Then x >= 0 and y >= 0.
If c >= 0, then cx >= 0 and cy >= 0.
If c < 0, then cx < 0 and cy < 0, which means that [cx, cy] is not in W.
Therefore, W is not closed under scalar multiplication when the scalar is negative.

Since W is not closed under scalar multiplication for all scalars, W is not a subspace of R^2.
False
deepseekr1

To determine if \( W = \{[x, y] \in \mathbb{R}^2 : x \geq 0 \text{ and } y \geq 0\} \) is a subspace of \( \mathbb{R}^2 \), we verify the three subspace criteria:

1. **Zero Vector**: \( [0, 0] \in W \), since \( 0 \geq 0 \). ✔️
2. **Closed Under Addition**: For \( [x_1, y_1], [x_2, y_2] \in W \), their sum \( [x_1 + x_2, y_1 + y_2] \) has \( x_1 + x_2 \geq 0 \) and \( y_1 + y_2 \geq 0 \), so it remains in \( W \). ✔️
3. **Closed Under Scalar Multiplication**: Let \( \alpha \in \mathbb{R} \). If \( \alpha < 0 \) (e.g., \( \alpha = -1 \)) and \( [x, y] \in W \), then \( \alpha[x, y] = [\alpha x, \alpha y] \) has negative components, which are not in \( W \). ❌

**Conclusion**: Since \( W \) is not closed under scalar multiplication, it is **not** a subspace of \( \mathbb{R}^2 \).

**Answer**: No, \( W \) is not a subspace of \( \mathbb{R}^2 \) because it fails closure under scalar multiplication.
False
gpto1 To determine whether the set \( W = \{ [x, y] \in \mathbb{R}^2 : x \geq 0 \text{ and } y \geq 0 \} \) is a subspace of \( \mathbb{R}^2 \), we'll verify if it satisfies the three key properties that define a subspace:

1. **Non-emptiness (Contains the zero vector)**
2. **Closure under vector addition**
3. **Closure under scalar multiplication**

### 1. Non-emptiness

A subspace must contain the zero vector.

- The zero vector in \( \mathbb{R}^2 \) is \( \mathbf{0} = [0, 0] \).
- Since \( 0 \geq 0 \) and \( 0 \geq 0 \), \( \mathbf{0} \in W \).

**Conclusion:** \( W \) is non-empty as it contains the zero vector.

### 2. Closure under Vector Addition

For any vectors \( \mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v} \in W \), their sum \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} \) must also be in \( W \).

Let \( \mathbf{u} = [x_1, y_1] \) and \( \mathbf{v} = [x_2, y_2] \) where \( x_1, x_2, y_1, y_2 \geq 0 \).

- Sum: \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} = [x_1 + x_2, y_1 + y_2] \)
- Since \( x_1, x_2 \geq 0 \), their sum \( x_1 + x_2 \geq 0 \).
- Similarly, \( y_1 + y_2 \geq 0 \).

**Conclusion:** \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} \in W \), so \( W \) is closed under addition.

### 3. Closure under Scalar Multiplication

For any vector \( \mathbf{u} \in W \) and any scalar \( c \in \mathbb{R} \), the product \( c\mathbf{u} \) must also be in \( W \).

Let \( \mathbf{u} = [x, y] \) where \( x, y \geq 0 \).

Consider scalar \( c \in \mathbb{R} \):

#### Case 1: \( c \geq 0 \)

- \( c x \geq 0 \) since \( c \geq 0 \) and \( x \geq 0 \).
- \( c y \geq 0 \) since \( c \geq 0 \) and \( y \geq 0 \).
- Therefore, \( c\mathbf{u} = [c x, c y] \in W \).

#### Case 2: \( c < 0 \)

- \( c x \leq 0 \) since \( c < 0 \) and \( x \geq 0 \).
- \( c y \leq 0 \) since \( c < 0 \) and \( y \geq 0 \).
- Therefore, at least one of \( c x \) or \( c y \) is not greater than or equal to zero.

**Example:**

Let \( \mathbf{u} = [1, 1] \in W \) and \( c = -1 \).

- \( c\mathbf{u} = -1 \cdot [1, 1] = [-1, -1] \).
- Since \( -1 \not\geq 0 \), \( c\mathbf{u} \notin W \).

**Conclusion:** \( W \) is **not** closed under scalar multiplication when \( c < 0 \).

### Final Conclusion

Since \( W \) fails to satisfy closure under scalar multiplication for all real scalars, it is **not** a subspace of \( \mathbb{R}^2 \).

---

**Answer:** No, \( W \) is not a subspace of \( \mathbb{R}^2 \) because it is not closed under scalar multiplication by negative scalars.
False
GPT-4o To determine whether the set \( W = \{ [x, y] \in \mathbb{R}^2 : x \geq 0 \text{ and } y \geq 0 \} \) is a subspace of \(\mathbb{R}^2\), we need to check if \( W \) satisfies the three main criteria for being a subspace:

1. **Zero Vector**: The zero vector \( \mathbf{0} = [0, 0] \) must be in \( W \).
2. **Closed under Addition**: If \( \mathbf{u} \) and \( \mathbf{v} \) are in \( W \), then \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} \) must also be in \( W \).
3. **Closed under Scalar Multiplication**: If \( \mathbf{u} \) is in \( W \) and \( c \) is a scalar, then \( c \mathbf{u} \) must also be in \( W \).

Let's check each condition:

1. **Zero Vector**: The zero vector \( [0, 0] \) is in \( W \) because both \( 0 \geq 0 \) and \( 0 \geq 0 \) are true. So, this condition is satisfied.

2. **Closed under Addition**: Let \( \mathbf{u} = [x_1, y_1] \in W \) and \( \mathbf{v} = [x_2, y_2] \in W \). This means \( x_1 \geq 0 \), \( y_1 \geq 0 \), \( x_2 \geq 0 \), and \( y_2 \geq 0 \). Consider \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} = [x_1 + x_2, y_1 + y_2] \). Since \( x_1 + x_2 \geq 0 \) and \( y_1 + y_2 \geq 0 \), \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} \) is also in \( W \). Therefore, \( W \) is closed under addition.

3. **Closed under Scalar Multiplication**: Let \( \mathbf{u} = [x, y] \in W \) and let \( c \) be a scalar. We need to consider two cases:
- If \( c \geq 0 \), then \( c x \geq 0 \) and \( c y \geq 0 \), so \( c \mathbf{u} = [c x, c y] \in W \).
- If \( c < 0 \), then \( c x \leq 0 \) and \( c y \leq 0 \). For \( \mathbf{u} \) to remain in \( W \), both \( c x \geq 0 \) and \( c y \geq 0 \) must hold, which cannot be true if \( c < 0 \). Hence, \( c \mathbf{u} \) is not necessarily in \( W \) when \( c < 0 \).

Since \( W \) fails the scalar multiplication condition when \( c \) is negative, \( W \) is not closed under scalar multiplication for all scalars.

**Conclusion**: \( W \) is not a subspace of \(\mathbb{R}^2\) because it does not satisfy the requirement of being closed under scalar multiplication for all real numbers.
False
llama3.1-70B-Instruct

To determine if W = {[x, y] in R^2: x >= 0 and y >= 0} is a subspace of R^2, we need to check if it satisfies the three properties of a subspace:

1. **Closure under addition**: For any two vectors [x1, y1] and [x2, y2] in W, their sum [x1 + x2, y1 + y2] must also be in W.

Let's take two vectors [x1, y1] and [x2, y2] in W, where x1 >= 0, y1 >= 0, x2 >= 0, and y2 >= 0. Then, their sum is:

[x1 + x2, y1 + y2]

Since x1 + x2 >= 0 and y1 + y2 >= 0 (because the sum of non-negative numbers is non-negative), the sum [x1 + x2, y1 + y2] is also in W.

2. **Closure under scalar multiplication**: For any vector [x, y] in W and any scalar c in R, the product c[x, y] = [cx, cy] must also be in W.

Let's take a vector [x, y] in W, where x >= 0 and y >= 0, and a scalar c in R. Then, the product is:

[cx, cy]

If c >= 0, then cx >= 0 and cy >= 0, so [cx, cy] is in W.

However, if c < 0, then cx < 0 and cy < 0, so [cx, cy] is not in W.

Therefore, W is not closed under scalar multiplication.

Since W fails to satisfy one of the properties of a subspace, we can conclude that:

W = {[x, y] in R^2: x >= 0 and y >= 0} is not a subspace of R^2.
False
llama3.1-405B-Instruct

To determine if W = {[x, y] in R^2: x >= 0 and y >= 0} is a subspace of R^2, we need to check if it satisfies the three properties of a subspace:

1. W is non-empty: This is true, since the zero vector [0, 0] is in W.
2. W is closed under addition: Let [x1, y1] and [x2, y2] be two vectors in W. Then, x1 >= 0, y1 >= 0, x2 >= 0, and y2 >= 0. Adding these vectors, we get [x1 + x2, y1 + y2]. Since x1 + x2 >= 0 and y1 + y2 >= 0, the sum is also in W.
3. W is closed under scalar multiplication: Let [x, y] be a vector in W and c be a scalar. Then, x >= 0 and y >= 0. Multiplying [x, y] by c, we get [cx, cy]. Since cx >= 0 and cy >= 0, the scalar multiple is also in W.

Since W satisfies all three properties, it is a subspace of R^2.
False
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 To determine whether the set W = {[x, y] in R^2: x >= 0 and y >= 0} is a subspace of R^2, we need to check if it satisfies the three subspace properties:

1. **Contains the zero vector**: The zero vector in R^2 is [0, 0]. Since 0 >= 0 and 0 >= 0, the zero vector [0, 0] is in W. Therefore, W contains the zero vector.

2. **Closed under vector addition**: For any two vectors [x1, y1] and [x2, y2] in W, their sum [x1 + x2, y1 + y2] must also be in W. Since x1 >= 0, x2 >= 0, y1 >= 0, and y2 >= 0, it follows that x1 + x2 >= 0 and y1 + y2 >= 0. Therefore, the sum [x1 + x2, y1 + y2] is in W. Thus, W is closed under vector addition.

3. **Closed under scalar multiplication**: For any vector [x, y] in W and any scalar c in R, the product c[x, y] = [cx, cy] must also be in W. If c is non-negative (c >= 0), then cx >= 0 and cy >= 0, so [cx, cy] is in W. However, if c is negative (c < 0), then cx < 0 and cy < 0, which means [cx, cy] is not in W. Therefore, W is not closed under scalar multiplication by all real numbers.

Since W is not closed under scalar multiplication by all real numbers, it does not satisfy all the subspace properties. Therefore, W is not a subspace of R^2.
False
Qwen2-72B-Instruct To determine if W = {[x, y] in R^2: x >= 0 and y >= 0} is a subspace of R^2, we need to check if W satisfies the three subspace properties:

1. The zero vector is in W.
2. W is closed under vector addition.
3. W is closed under scalar multiplication.

Let's check these properties one by one:

1. The zero vector is in W.
The zero vector in R^2 is [0, 0]. Since 0 >= 0 and 0 >= 0, the zero vector is indeed in W.

2. W is closed under vector addition.
Let [x1, y1] and [x2, y2] be two vectors in W. Then x1 >= 0, y1 >= 0, x2 >= 0, and y2 >= 0.
The sum of these two vectors is [x1 + x2, y1 + y2].
Since x1 >= 0, x2 >= 0, then x1 + x2 >= 0.
Similarly, since y1 >= 0, y2 >= 0, then y1 + y2 >= 0.
Therefore, [x1 + x2, y1 + y2] is also in W, and W is closed under vector addition.

3. W is closed under scalar multiplication.
Let [x, y] be a vector in W and c be a scalar.
Then x >= 0 and y >= 0.
If c >= 0, then cx >= 0 and cy >= 0.
If c < 0, then cx < 0 and cy < 0, which means that [cx, cy] is not in W.
Therefore, W is not closed under scalar multiplication when the scalar is negative.

Since W is not closed under scalar multiplication for all scalars, W is not a subspace of R^2.
False
baichuan4 To determine if W = {[x, y] ∈ R^2: x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0} is a subspace of R^2, we need to check if it satisfies the three properties of a subspace:

1. The zero vector (0, 0) must be in W.
2. For any vectors u = [u1, u2] and v = [v1, v2] in W, the sum u + v must also be in W.
3. For any vector u = [u1, u2] in W and any scalar c ∈ R, the product cu must also be in W.

Let's check these properties:

1. The zero vector (0, 0) is in W because both its components are non-negative.

2. Let u = [u1, u2] and v = [v1, v2] be vectors in W. Then, u + v = [u1 + v1, u2 + v2]. Since u1, u2, v1, and v2 are all non-negative, their sums u1 + v1 and u2 + v2 will also be non-negative. Therefore, u + v is in W.

3. Let u = [u1, u2] be a vector in W and let c be any scalar in R. Then, cu = [cu1, cu2]. If c is positive or zero, then cu1 and cu2 will be non-negative, so cu will be in W. However, if c is negative, then cu1 and cu2 will be non-positive, which means cu will not be in W.

Since W does not satisfy the third property of a subspace when c is negative, W is not a subspace of R^2.
False
doubao To determine if W is a subspace of R^2, we need to check three conditions:
1. The zero vector is in W. The zero vector in R^2 is [0, 0], and since both 0 >= 0, the zero vector is in W.
2. Closure under addition. Let [x1, y1] and [x2, y2] be in W. Then x1 >= 0 and y1 >= 0, and x2 >= 0 and y2 >= 0. Their sum is [x1 + x2, y1 + y2]. Since x1 + x2 >= 0 and y1 + y2 >= 0, the sum is in W, so W is closed under addition.
3. Closure under scalar multiplication. Let [x, y] be in W and c be a scalar. Then x >= 0 and y >= 0. c[x, y] = [cx, cy]. Since cx >= 0 and cy >= 0 for a non-negative scalar c, W is closed under scalar multiplication.

Since all three conditions are satisfied, W is a subspace of R^2.
False
minimax To determine whether a set W is a subspace of R^2, we need to check if it satisfies the three subspace properties:

1. The zero vector is in W.
2. W is closed under vector addition.
3. W is closed under scalar multiplication.

Let's check each property for the set W = {[x, y] in R^2: x >= 0 and y >= 0}:

1. Zero vector in W:
The zero vector in R^2 is [0, 0]. Since both components of the zero vector are non-negative (in fact, they are zero), the zero vector is indeed in W. So, W satisfies the first property.

2. Closure under vector addition:
Let [x1, y1] and [x2, y2] be two vectors in W. This means x1 >= 0, y1 >= 0, x2 >= 0, and y2 >= 0. When we add these two vectors, we get [x1 + x2, y1 + y2]. Since the sum of two non-negative numbers is non-negative, x1 + x2 >= 0 and y1 + y2 >= 0. Therefore, the resulting vector is also in W. So, W satisfies the second property.

3. Closure under scalar multiplication:
Let [x, y] be a vector in W, which means x >= 0 and y >= 0. Now, consider a scalar k in R. If we multiply the vector [x, y] by the scalar k, we get [kx, ky]. If k is non-negative, then kx >= 0 and ky >= 0, and the resulting vector is in W. However, if k is negative, then kx and ky could be negative, which would result in a vector that is not in W. Therefore, W is not closed under scalar multiplication for all possible scalars in R.

Since W fails the third property (closure under scalar multiplication for all scalars), it is not a subspace of R^2.
False
kimi To determine if W is a subspace of R^2, we need to check if it satisfies the three subspace criteria:

1. The zero vector (0,0) is in W.
2. W is closed under vector addition.
3. W is closed under scalar multiplication.

Let's check each criterion:

1. The zero vector (0,0) is in W because 0 >= 0 and 0 >= 0.

2. W is closed under vector addition:
Let [x1, y1] and [x2, y2] be vectors in W. Then x1 >= 0, y1 >= 0, x2 >= 0, and y2 >= 0.
When we add these vectors, we get [x1 + x2, y1 + y2].
Since x1 >= 0 and x2 >= 0, their sum x1 + x2 is also greater than or equal to 0.
Similarly, y1 >= 0 and y2 >= 0, so y1 + y2 is also greater than or equal to 0.
Therefore, [x1 + x2, y1 + y2] is also in W.

3. W is closed under scalar multiplication:
Let [x, y] be a vector in W and let c be a scalar.
Then x >= 0 and y >= 0.
When we multiply the vector by the scalar, we get [cx, cy].
If c >= 0, then cx >= 0 and cy >= 0, so [cx, cy] is in W.
If c < 0, then cx < 0 and/or cy < 0, so [cx, cy] is not in W.

Since W is not closed under scalar multiplication for all scalars (specifically, it is not closed for negative scalars), W is not a subspace of R^2.

Solution: W is not a subspace of R^2.
False
wenxinyiyan 首先,我们需要明确子空间的定义。在R^2中,一个子空间需要满足以下三个条件:

1. 包含原点:子空间中必须包含原点(0,0)。
2. 封闭性:对于子空间中的任意两个元素,它们的和仍然在子空间中。
3. 数乘封闭性:对于子空间中的任意元素和任意实数,它们的乘积仍然在子空间中。

现在,我们来判断W是否满足这些条件。

1. 包含原点:由于x >= 0 and y >= 0,原点(0,0)显然在W中。
2. 封闭性:考虑W中的两个元素[x1, y1]和[x2, y2],它们的和为[x1+x2, y1+y2]。由于x1, x2, y1, y2都大于等于0,所以x1+x2和y1+y2也都大于等于0。因此,[x1+x2, y1+y2]也在W中。
3. 数乘封闭性:考虑W中的元素[x, y]和任意实数k,它们的乘积为[kx, ky]。如果k是非负的,那么kx和ky都大于等于0,所以[kx, ky]在W中。但是,如果k是负数,那么kx和ky可能小于0,所以[kx, ky]可能不在W中。

由于W不满足数乘封闭性,所以W不是R^2的子空间。
False
zhipu To determine if \( W = \{ [x, y] \in \mathbb{R}^2 : x \geq 0 \text{ and } y \geq 0 \} \) is a subspace of \( \mathbb{R}^2 \), we need to check if \( W \) satisfies the three criteria for being a subspace:

1. **Contains the Zero Vector:** The zero vector \( [0, 0] \) must be in \( W \).
2. **Closed under Vector Addition:** If \( \mathbf{u} \) and \( \mathbf{v} \) are in \( W \), then \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} \) must also be in \( W \).
3. **Closed under Scalar Multiplication:** If \( \mathbf{u} \) is in \( W \) and \( c \) is any scalar, then \( c\mathbf{u} \) must also be in \( W \).

### Step-by-Step Verification:

1. **Contains the Zero Vector:**
- The zero vector in \( \mathbb{R}^2 \) is \( [0, 0] \).
- Clearly, \( [0, 0] \in W \) because \( 0 \geq 0 \) and \( 0 \geq 0 \).

2. **Closed under Vector Addition:**
- Let \( \mathbf{u} = [x_1, y_1] \) and \( \mathbf{v} = [x_2, y_2] \) be vectors in \( W \).
- This means \( x_1 \geq 0 \), \( y_1 \geq 0 \), \( x_2 \geq 0 \), and \( y_2 \geq 0 \).
- Consider the vector sum \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} = [x_1 + x_2, y_1 + y_2] \).
- Since \( x_1 \geq 0 \) and \( x_2 \geq 0 \), it follows that \( x_1 + x_2 \geq 0 \).
- Similarly, since \( y_1 \geq 0 \) and \( y_2 \geq 0 \), it follows that \( y_1 + y_2 \geq 0 \).
- Therefore, \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} \in W \).

3. **Closed under Scalar Multiplication:**
- Let \( \mathbf{u} = [x, y] \) be a vector in \( W \) and \( c \) be any scalar.
- This means \( x \geq 0 \) and \( y \geq 0 \).
- Consider the scalar multiple \( c\mathbf{u} = [cx, cy] \).
- For \( c\mathbf{u} \) to be in \( W \), both \( cx \) and \( cy \) must be non-negative.
- However, if \( c \) is a negative scalar, then \( cx \) and \( cy \) can be negative, which means \( c\mathbf{u} \notin W \).

### Conclusion:
While \( W \) contains the zero vector and is closed under vector addition, it is **not** closed under scalar multiplication when the scalar is negative. Therefore, \( W \) does not satisfy all the criteria to be a subspace of \( \mathbb{R}^2 \).

**Answer: \( W \) is not a subspace of \( \mathbb{R}^2 \).**
False
gpto1 To determine whether the set \( W = \{ [x, y] \in \mathbb{R}^2 : x \geq 0 \text{ and } y \geq 0 \} \) is a subspace of \( \mathbb{R}^2 \), we'll verify if it satisfies the three key properties that define a subspace:

1. **Non-emptiness (Contains the zero vector)**
2. **Closure under vector addition**
3. **Closure under scalar multiplication**

### 1. Non-emptiness

A subspace must contain the zero vector.

- The zero vector in \( \mathbb{R}^2 \) is \( \mathbf{0} = [0, 0] \).
- Since \( 0 \geq 0 \) and \( 0 \geq 0 \), \( \mathbf{0} \in W \).

**Conclusion:** \( W \) is non-empty as it contains the zero vector.

### 2. Closure under Vector Addition

For any vectors \( \mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v} \in W \), their sum \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} \) must also be in \( W \).

Let \( \mathbf{u} = [x_1, y_1] \) and \( \mathbf{v} = [x_2, y_2] \) where \( x_1, x_2, y_1, y_2 \geq 0 \).

- Sum: \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} = [x_1 + x_2, y_1 + y_2] \)
- Since \( x_1, x_2 \geq 0 \), their sum \( x_1 + x_2 \geq 0 \).
- Similarly, \( y_1 + y_2 \geq 0 \).

**Conclusion:** \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} \in W \), so \( W \) is closed under addition.

### 3. Closure under Scalar Multiplication

For any vector \( \mathbf{u} \in W \) and any scalar \( c \in \mathbb{R} \), the product \( c\mathbf{u} \) must also be in \( W \).

Let \( \mathbf{u} = [x, y] \) where \( x, y \geq 0 \).

Consider scalar \( c \in \mathbb{R} \):

#### Case 1: \( c \geq 0 \)

- \( c x \geq 0 \) since \( c \geq 0 \) and \( x \geq 0 \).
- \( c y \geq 0 \) since \( c \geq 0 \) and \( y \geq 0 \).
- Therefore, \( c\mathbf{u} = [c x, c y] \in W \).

#### Case 2: \( c < 0 \)

- \( c x \leq 0 \) since \( c < 0 \) and \( x \geq 0 \).
- \( c y \leq 0 \) since \( c < 0 \) and \( y \geq 0 \).
- Therefore, at least one of \( c x \) or \( c y \) is not greater than or equal to zero.

**Example:**

Let \( \mathbf{u} = [1, 1] \in W \) and \( c = -1 \).

- \( c\mathbf{u} = -1 \cdot [1, 1] = [-1, -1] \).
- Since \( -1 \not\geq 0 \), \( c\mathbf{u} \notin W \).

**Conclusion:** \( W \) is **not** closed under scalar multiplication when \( c < 0 \).

### Final Conclusion

Since \( W \) fails to satisfy closure under scalar multiplication for all real scalars, it is **not** a subspace of \( \mathbb{R}^2 \).

---

**Answer:** No, \( W \) is not a subspace of \( \mathbb{R}^2 \) because it is not closed under scalar multiplication by negative scalars.
False
deepseekv3 To determine whether \( W = \{[x, y] \in \mathbb{R}^2: x \geq 0 \text{ and } y \geq 0\} \) is a subspace of \( \mathbb{R}^2 \), we need to verify if \( W \) satisfies the three properties of a subspace:

1. **Contains the zero vector**: The zero vector \( [0, 0] \) must be in \( W \).
2. **Closed under vector addition**: If \( \mathbf{u} = [u_1, u_2] \) and \( \mathbf{v} = [v_1, v_2] \) are in \( W \), then \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} \) must also be in \( W \).
3. **Closed under scalar multiplication**: If \( \mathbf{u} = [u_1, u_2] \) is in \( W \) and \( c \) is a scalar, then \( c\mathbf{u} \) must also be in \( W \).

---

### Step 1: Contains the zero vector
The zero vector \( [0, 0] \) satisfies \( x \geq 0 \) and \( y \geq 0 \), so \( [0, 0] \in W \).
**Property 1 is satisfied.**

---

### Step 2: Closed under vector addition
Let \( \mathbf{u} = [u_1, u_2] \) and \( \mathbf{v} = [v_1, v_2] \) be in \( W \), so \( u_1, u_2, v_1, v_2 \geq 0 \).
Then, \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} = [u_1 + v_1, u_2 + v_2] \). Since \( u_1 + v_1 \geq 0 \) and \( u_2 + v_2 \geq 0 \), \( \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v} \in W \).
**Property 2 is satisfied.**

---

### Step 3: Closed under scalar multiplication
Let \( \mathbf{u} = [u_1, u_2] \in W \), so \( u_1, u_2 \geq 0 \).
For scalar multiplication, consider \( c \in \mathbb{R} \). If \( c \geq 0 \), then \( c\mathbf{u} = [cu_1, cu_2] \in W \) because \( cu_1, cu_2 \geq 0 \).
However, if \( c < 0 \), then \( cu_1, cu_2 \leq 0 \), so \( c\mathbf{u} \notin W \).
Since \( W \) is not closed under scalar multiplication for all scalars, **Property 3 is not satisfied.**

---

### Conclusion
Since \( W \) fails to satisfy the third property of a subspace, \( W \) is **not a subspace of \( \mathbb{R}^2 \)**.
False