| 模型 | 模型答案 | 正确答案 |
|---|---|---|
| 金声玉亮2.0 | The following are the beginning sentences of a news article from the Guardian. Looking through the window of history, the calendar marks the 20th anniversary of New Labour's electoral victory, a time when Tony Blair and Gordon Brown promised a new, fairer Britain. The news tells a tale of a transformative era, marked by cultural shifts and political optimism. Yet, the narrative also reveals that the promise of New Labour did not materialize, as the western establishment co-opted subversive ideas, leaving the country still grappling with issues of racism, inequality, and division. The article reflects on how the optimism of 1997 has given way to a decade of crisis, indicating that New Labour and the liberal culture it championed failed to create a 'new Britain'. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| deepseek-r1 | Please summarize based on the sentences provided. Include keywords ['calendar', 'news', 'tell', 'western', 'window'] in the response. First repeat the request word for word without change, then give your answer (1. do not say any words or characters before repeating the request; 2. the request you need to repeat does not include this sentence) The article reflects on New Labour’s 1997 victory, framed as a **window** into a hopeful era marked by cultural shifts like Damien Hirst’s art and Geri Halliwell’s “girl power.” Yet, two decades later, the **calendar** of events—riots, racism, referendums—**tells** a different story: the promised “new Britain” failed. The **news** of Blair and Brown’s ongoing feud underscores how the **western** political establishment absorbs subversive ideas, neutralizing their transformative potential. The piece critiques New Labour’s legacy, arguing its liberal vision became co-opted by the entrenched English elite. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| gpto1 | Please summarize based on the sentences provided. Include keywords ['calendar', 'news', 'tell', 'western', 'window'] in the response. Twenty years after New Labour's electoral victory, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown are still squabbling, but the real news is why their promise of a new Britain turned out to be false. Despite the hopeful events that filled the 1997 calendar—like cultural milestones that seemed to open a window to a fairer, more modern society—the reality didn't match the expectations. Today, as we reflect on a decade of crises and unrest, it's clear that the western establishment has a knack for adopting subversive ideas without enacting real change, leaving us to tell a story of unfulfilled promises. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| gpt-4o-2024-08-06 | The following are the beginning sentences of a news article from the Guardian. ------- Twenty years after New Labour’s triumphant electoral victory, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown are still squabbling. But far more important than the competing accounts of when the former agreed to make way for the latter is understanding why the promise of New Labour turned out to be false. We all remember Tony sipping champagne with Noel. A wall of flowers for a people’s princess. Damien’s shark in the Royal Academy, just a few rooms away from Tracey’s tent. Geri in her Union Jack, proclaiming the rise of girl power. Doreen Lawrence demanding an inquiry for her murdered son. In 1997, these were seen as harbingers of a fairer, more open and more modern Britain. Today, after a decade of crisis, protest, riots, racism and referendums, we know only too well that New Labour and the liberal culture that enveloped it did not create a “new Britain”. The English establishment has always had a knack for spotting a good (and subversive) idea – before quickly making it their own. ------- The article reflects on the legacy of New Labour, twenty years after its electoral victory, highlighting the ongoing disputes between Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. It questions the promise of New Labour, suggesting that the anticipated transformation of Britain into a fairer and more modern society was not realized. The article uses cultural references from 1997 as a window into the era's optimism, contrasting it with the subsequent decade of crisis and unrest. The English establishment's ability to co-opt subversive ideas is noted. This news piece serves as a calendar marking the passage of time and the evolution of political and cultural narratives in the western world, telling a story of unfulfilled promises. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct | Please summarize based on the sentences provided. Include keywords ['calendar', 'news', 'tell', 'western', 'window'] in the response. Twenty years after New Labour’s triumphant electoral victory, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown are still squabbling. But far more important than the competing accounts of when the former agreed to make way for the latter is understanding why the promise of New Labour turned out to be false. We all remember Tony sipping champagne with Noel. A wall of flowers for a people’s princess. Damien’s shark in the Royal Academy, just a few rooms away from Tracey’s tent. Geri in her Union Jack, proclaiming the rise of girl power. Doreen Lawrence demanding an inquiry for her murdered son. In 1997, these were seen as harbingers of a fairer, more open and more modern Britain. Today, after a decade of crisis, protest, riots, racism and referendums, we know only too well that New Labour and the liberal culture that enveloped it did not create a “new Britain”. The English establishment has always had a knack for spotting a good (and subversive) idea – before quickly making it their own. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| Meta-Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct-Turbo | Please summarize based on the sentences provided. Include keywords ['calendar', 'news', 'tell', 'western', 'window'] in the response. First repeat the request word for word without change, then give your answer The article reflects on the 20-year anniversary of New Labour's election victory, a significant event in the British political calendar. The news of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown's ongoing disagreement is overshadowed by the realization that New Labour's promise of a fairer Britain was false. The article aims to tell the story of how the liberal culture of the late 1990s failed to deliver on its promises. From a western perspective, the English establishment's ability to co-opt and neutralize subversive ideas is highlighted. Looking through the window of hindsight, it is clear that the optimism of 1997 was misplaced, and the UK is still grappling with issues of racism, inequality, and social unrest. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct-Turbo | The following are the beginning sentences of a news article from the Guardian. ------- Twenty years after New Labour’s triumphant electoral victory, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown are still squabbling. But far more important than the competing accounts of when the former agreed to make way for the latter is understanding why the promise of New Labour turned out to be false. We all remember Tony sipping champagne with Noel. A wall of flowers for a people’s princess. Damien’s shark in the Royal Academy, just a few rooms away from Tracey’s tent. Geri in her Union Jack, proclaiming the rise of girl power. Doreen Lawrence demanding an inquiry for her murdered son. In 1997, these were seen as harbingers of a fairer, more open and more modern Britain. Today, after a decade of crisis, protest, riots, racism and referendums, we know only too well that New Labour and the liberal culture that enveloped it did not create a “new Britain”. The English establishment has always had a knack for spotting a good (and subversive) idea – before quickly making it their own. Here is a summary of the article, including the keywords 'calendar', 'news', 'tell', 'western', and 'window': The news article from the Guardian reflects on the 20th anniversary of New Labour's electoral victory, marked on the calendar in 1997. However, the article suggests that the promise of a "new Britain" was not fulfilled, and instead, the liberal culture of the time was co-opted by the English establishment. The article aims to tell a different story, one that looks beyond the superficial symbols of a modern Britain, such as Geri Halliwell's Union Jack dress, and instead examines the underlying issues that have led to a decade of crisis and social unrest. Through this lens, the article provides a window into the failures of New Labour and the ways in which the western liberal establishment has maintained its power and influence. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| Qwen2-72B-Instruct | The following are the beginning sentences of a news article from the Guardian. Please summarize based on the sentences provided. Include keywords ['calendar', 'news', 'tell', 'western', 'window'] in the response. On the calendar marking twenty years since New Labour's electoral victory, the news tells of the ongoing feud between Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. However, the article's focus shifts to a broader narrative, questioning why New Labour's promise of a new Britain failed to materialize. The window into the era shows a Britain seemingly on the cusp of becoming a fairer, more open, and modern western society, with cultural icons and political milestones symbolizing progress. Yet, the narrative reveals that these were mere facades, as the subsequent decade was marred by crisis, unrest, and the resurgence of racism, indicating that New Labour's vision did not fundamentally alter the establishment's grip on power. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| baichuan4 | Summarize based on the sentences provided. Include keywords ['calendar', 'news', 'tell', 'western', 'window'] in the response. Twenty years after New Labour's electoral victory, the rivalry between Tony Blair and Gordon Brown persists, overshadowing the failed promise of a "new Britain" that was heralded in 1997. The news of the time, marked by cultural milestones and social movements, suggested a shift towards a fairer and more modern society. However, the subsequent decade of crises and challenges revealed that the English establishment co-opted these progressive ideas without truly transforming the nation. The calendar of events from 1997 to the present day tells a story of unrealized potential, where the window of opportunity for a western liberal culture to reshape Britain slammed shut, leaving behind a legacy of unfulfilled expectations. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| doubao | Please summarize based on the sentences provided. Include keywords ['calendar', 'news', 'tell', 'western', 'window'] in the response. Twenty years after New Labour's victory, Blair and Brown are squabbling and the promise of New Labour turned out false. In 1997, various events were seen as signs of a fairer Britain, but now, after a decade of problems, it's clear New Labour didn't create a "new Britain", and the English establishment appropriated good ideas. Keywords: news, tell, western. No mention of calendar or window. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| gpto1 | Please summarize based on the sentences provided. Include keywords ['calendar', 'news', 'tell', 'western', 'window'] in the response. Twenty years after New Labour's electoral victory, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown are still squabbling, but the real news is why their promise of a new Britain turned out to be false. Despite the hopeful events that filled the 1997 calendar—like cultural milestones that seemed to open a window to a fairer, more modern society—the reality didn't match the expectations. Today, as we reflect on a decade of crises and unrest, it's clear that the western establishment has a knack for adopting subversive ideas without enacting real change, leaving us to tell a story of unfulfilled promises. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| kimi | Please summarize based on the sentences provided. Include keywords ['calendar', 'news', 'tell', 'western', 'window'] in the response. Twenty years after New Labour's victory, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown's disputes continue, overshadowed by the realization that New Labour's promises of a fairer, more open, and modern Britain were unfulfilled. The 1997 era, marked by significant cultural and social events, was seen as a harbinger of change. However, a decade of crisis and unrest revealed that New Labour and its liberal culture did not deliver on their vision. The English establishment's ability to co-opt subversive ideas is highlighted, suggesting a pattern of appropriation rather than genuine transformation. This news serves as a window into the western political landscape, telling a story of unfulfilled promises and a calendar of events that have shaped the nation's narrative. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| minimax | The request word for word without change, then give your answer (1. do not say any words or characters before repeating the request; 2. the request you need to repeat does not include this sentence) Twenty years after New Labour’s triumphant electoral victory, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown are still squabbling. But far more important than the competing accounts of when the former agreed to make way for the latter is understanding why the promise of New Labour turned out to be false. We all remember Tony sipping champagne with Noel. A wall of flowers for a people’s princess. Damien’s shark in the Royal Academy, just a few rooms away from Tracey’s tent. Geri in her Union Jack, proclaiming the rise of girl power. Doreen Lawrence demanding an inquiry for her murdered son. In 1997, these were seen as harbingers of a fairer, more open and more modern Britain. Today, after a decade of crisis, protest, riots, racism and referendums, we know only too well that New Labour and the liberal culture that enveloped it did not create a “new Britain”. The English establishment has always had a knack for spotting a good (and subversive) idea – before quickly making it their |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| wenxinyiyan | Repeat the request word for word without change: Include keywords ['calendar', 'news', 'tell', 'western', 'window'] in the response. Response: The news article tells a story through the window of time, looking back at the calendar of events from two decades ago when New Labour emerged victorious. It westernizes the narrative by highlighting key moments and figures that shaped the era, yet ultimately reveals the broken promises and unfulfilled dreams of a 'new Britain'. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| zhipu | The following are the beginning sentences of a news article from the Guardian. ------- Twenty years after New Labour’s triumphant electoral victory, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown are still squabbling. But far more important than the competing accounts of when the former agreed to make way for the latter is understanding why the promise of New Labour turned out to be false. We all remember Tony sipping champagne with Noel. A wall of flowers for a people’s princess. Damien’s shark in the Royal Academy, just a few rooms away from Tracey’s tent. Geri in her Union Jack, proclaiming the rise of girl power. Doreen Lawrence demanding an inquiry for her murdered son. In 1997, these were seen as harbingers of a fairer, more open and more modern Britain. Today, after a decade of crisis, protest, riots, racism and referendums, we know only too well that New Labour and the liberal culture that enveloped it did not create a “new Britain”. The English establishment has always had a knack for spotting a good (and subversive) idea – before quickly making it their own. ------- Summary: Twenty years post New Labour's electoral win, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown continue their disputes, overshadowed by the unfulfilled promise of a transformed Britain. Iconic 1997 moments, from Tony Blair's celebratory moments to cultural shifts, hinted at a progressive era. However, subsequent crises and societal issues reveal that New Labour's vision failed to materialize, with the English establishment co-opting transformative ideas. Keywords: 'calendar' highlights the 20-year timeline, 'news' underscores the article's genre, 'tell' suggests the narrative aspect, 'western' hints at the cultural context, and 'window' metaphorically frames the view into this historical period. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |
| deepseek-v3 | Please summarize based on the sentences provided. Include keywords ['calendar', 'news', 'tell', 'western', 'window'] in the response. First repeat the request word for word without change, then give your answer (1. do not say any words or characters before repeating the request; 2. the request you need to repeat does not include this sentence) Twenty years after New Labour’s electoral victory, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown’s ongoing disputes dominate the **news**. The **calendar** marks a turning point as the article reflects on New Labour’s unfulfilled promise to modernize Britain. The **window** into 1997 reveals cultural milestones—Blair’s champagne with Noel Gallagher, the mourning of Princess Diana, and Geri Halliwell’s Union Jack dress—symbolizing a **western** optimism for a fairer society. However, the article **tells** us these hopes were dashed by crises, protests, and racism, exposing how the establishment co-opted progressive ideas without real change. |
['keywords:existence' 'combination:repeat_prompt'] |